United States of America, and v. State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, And
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a continuing dispute between the state and federal governments over authority to determine the scope of operations of New Melones Dam, on the Stanislaus River in California. The New Melones project was originally authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 887, 901. In 1962 Congress appropriated funds to make the dam a large, multi-purpose project by enacting section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962, Pub.L. 87-874, 76 Stat. 1173. The 1962 statute governs for our purposes. 1 The project, as envisioned, would ultimately store…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- South Delta Water Agency v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Del Puerto Water District v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.