Legal Opinion

State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Templeton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1979No. 4042PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

The Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission appeals a judgment of the superior court ordering it to award certain classification points and an entry permit to Phillip Templeton. For the reasons set forth in Part III below, we affirm.

I. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND

In 1973, the Limited Entry Act, AS 16.43, was passed by the Alaska Legislature 1 for the purpose of regulating and controlling entry into the commercial fisheries “in the public interest and without unjust discrimination.” AS 16.43.010. The Act established the Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout CouncilAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Swindel v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API