Tingley v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, Whatcom, County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
We are not advised upon what' ground the court below sustained the defendañt’s motion for a non-suit, but, whatever may have been the ground, we think the facts in this case, as they appear from the testimony, *645should have been submitted to a jury under proper instructions.
The complaint contains two causes of action, which were improperly united, but no objection was made to the complaint upon that ground, and no criticism can now be made of the course of the plaintiff in making the improper joinder.
The defendant was a corporation organized in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Meeker v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Brown v. WinehillWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. Wallace Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Delaware Insurance v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Tingley v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Wright v. Seattle Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.