Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wright v. Seattle Grocery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1919No. 14677PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered November 3, 1917, upon, the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The sales agent of the appellant sold to the respondent a car-load of flour, and delivered to him a copy of a memorandum of the sale in the following form:

“Seattle Grocery Company (Incorporated.)
“Corner Western Avenue and Columbia Street.
“Phone Main 842.
“Seattle, Wash., April 6, 1917. “Sold to Chauncey Wright,
“L. C. Smith Bldg., Seattle, Wash.

Coffee, Spices, ‘Halcyon’ Food Products,

1 Car Gold Medal Flour............$2,790.46.”

The memorandum of the sale was a printed blank form, on which was entered in writing, at the time of sale, the date, name and address of purchaser, and the statement of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  3. Anderson v. Wallace Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Western Timber Co. v. Kalama River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Dinuba Farmers' Union Packing Co. v. J. M. Anderson Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dineen v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Jacobs v. DancigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API