Brown v. Winehill
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from, Superior Court, King County. Motion to re-tax costs allowed appellants upon reversal of the judgment of the trial court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J. —
The respondent moves to re-tax the costs allowed by the clerk of this court upon the appellants’ cost bill which contained an item of $250 paid for stenographers’ minutes of the trial. It is said that these minutes were procured for the purpose of preparing the statement on appeal. In fact they were not used for that purpose at all, but were thrown into the record bodily as the statement. Either way, however, the statute seems to make no provision for the allowance of such an outlay as a disbursement. In equity cases, it is true, the acts…
2Cited by4 opinions
- West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Tingley v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Wilson v. WigginWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Pettis v. Green River Asphalt Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1904