Legal Opinion
Samuel M. Langston Co. v. Continental Container Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1936No. 154PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is owner by assignment of the patent in suit which it is alleged has been infringed by the use by the defendant in the Eastern District of New York of a machine manufactured by George W. Swift, Jr., Inc. The manufacturer - is defending this action.
The patent relates to a cutter with its operating and adjusting gears so designed that it will cut off varying lengths of moving material without causing buckling or tearing. The particular material upon which the defendant used the cutter claimed to infringe is corrugated paper board as it ran out of the machine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Electric Railroad Signal Co. v. Hall Railway Signal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Weil Pump Co. v. Chicago Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flowers v. Austin-Western Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Mantz v. KerstingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Aerovox Corp. v. Micamold Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.