Legal Opinion

Keller v. American Sales Book Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1939No. Nos. 2118A, 2180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The two actions above-entitled have been consolidated and are being tried as one. The issues in each are the same, except as to the period of alleged liability. For the purposes of this opinion reference will be made to the defendants as one.

Plaintiff sues for the alleged infringement of Keller Patent No. 1,489,833. Claims 5 to 8 and 14 to 25, inclusive, are in suit. Claims 6, 17 and 25 are typical, and those only need be discussed.

The patent is titled “Method of Operating upon Printed Webs” and relates to the “production from a continuous printed web or webs of books,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Royer v. CoupeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Kalten-BachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Cocks v. Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  5. Carter Crume Co. v. American Sales Book Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. RichtarsicDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  2. Texas Urethane, Inc. v. Seacrest Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API