Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 31, 1950No. 9825PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, brought an action in the District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking a declaratory judgment that in the manufacture and sale of its ultra violet high pressure mercury vapor lamps it had not infringed the Germer Patent No. 2,202,199 owned by General Electric Company under which the defendant, Han-ovia Chemical and Manufacturing Company, has' exclusive rights in the field of ultra violet high pressure mercury vapor lamps. The district court held that the claims of the patent must be limited to the specific…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Samuel M. Langston Co. v. Continental Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- New York Asbestos Mfg. Co. v. Ambler Asbestos Air-Cell Covering Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Hanovia Chemical & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
3Cited by22 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Moon v. Cabot Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Catanzaro v. Masco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.