Legal Opinion
Aerovox Corp. v. Micamold Radio Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 9, 1937No. 392PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
Some of the claims of both of these patents which are now relied on were held valid and infringed by this court in Aerovox Corporation v. Concourse Electric Co., Inc., 65 F.(2d) 386, 389, and were also considered in connection with the counterclaim interposed in Ruben Condenser Corporation et al. v. Aerovox Corporation, 77 F.(2d) 266. This opinion is to. be read in connection with what we have already said in the two cases mentioned.
In the Concourse Case, supra, we held the cell patent the embodiment of inventive thought which would give it validity *46for the reason that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Aerovox Corp. v. Concourse Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Samuel M. Langston Co. v. Continental Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- CONDENSER CORPORATION, ETC. v. Micamold Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- General Foods Corp. v. Perk Foods Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Aerovox Corp. v. Cornell-Dubilier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Aerovox Corp. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938