Legal Opinion
Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 22, 2006No. 04 C 7666PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Murray (“Murray”) sued Defendant New Cingular Wireless Services 1 (“Cingular”) claiming that Cin-gular, while doing business as AT & T, unlawfully accessed his credit report prior to sending him a promotion for wireless service. He alleges that Cingular’s actions do not constitute a permissible basis to obtain a consumer report and violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (R. 30, Pl.’s Mot. for Class Cert, at 1.) Currently before this Court are Murray and Cingular’s cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Ruffin-Thompkins v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Regina R. King v. Preferred Technical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Nancy R. Murray, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Gmac Mortgage Corporation, Doing Business as ditech.com, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murray v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Cavin v. Home Loan Center Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Murray v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Schwartz v. Goal Financial LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Murray, Thomas v. New Cingular WirelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008