First National Bank v. Pacific Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
These three actions were brought against the Pacific Elevator Company to collect the amount of three notes executed by the Crescent Milling Company, payment of which the Pacific Elevator Company had guaranteed. They resulted in verdicts for the respective plaintiffs. The elevator company made an alternative motion ■for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial in each action and appealed from orders denying these motions.
The actions were tried separately, but the same transactions and the same questions are involved in each, and they were argued together in this court.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woods Lumber Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Reed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Northern National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Galbraith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Jesselsohn v. BoorsteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Farmington State Bank v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Eckhout v. Guardian National Bank of CommerceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
- Fremont National Bank v. Ferguson & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.