State v. Michael R. Griep
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 1. We review a decision of the court of appeals1 that affirmed the circuit court's2 ruling that admitted an expert *661witness's testimony that established the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of Michael R. Griep while he was operating his vehicle. The expert witness, Patrick Harding, based his opinion in part on forensic tests conducted by an analyst at the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (Wisconsin State Laboratory) who was unavailable for trial. Based on Harding's testimony, Griep was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (third offense).
¶ 2. Griep appealed,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. Glenn T. ZamzowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. Rozerick E. MattoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.