State v. Rozerick E. Mattox
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J.
The court of appeals certified this case to the court to determine whether the admission of a toxicology report through a medical examiner's testimony violated Rozerick E. Mattox's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. After a bench trial,1 Mattox was convicted of first-degree reckless homicide for delivering heroin that caused S.L.'s death.2 Specifically, the certified question asks:
Does it violate a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the State to introduce at trial a toxicology report…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Raymond L. NievesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Joseph B. ReinwandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Oscar C. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- People v. LangAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
- State v. Mark D. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.