Legal Opinion

State v. Rozerick E. Mattox

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2017No. 2015AP000158-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J.

The court of appeals certified this case to the court to determine whether the admission of a toxicology report through a medical examiner's testimony violated Rozerick E. Mattox's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. After a bench trial,1 Mattox was convicted of first-degree reckless homicide for delivering heroin that caused S.L.'s death.2 Specifically, the certified question asks:

Does it violate a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the State to introduce at trial a toxicology report…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Raymond L. NievesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Joseph B. ReinwandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. Oscar C. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  4. People v. LangAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  5. State v. Mark D. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API