State v. Glenn T. Zamzow
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*223REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J.
¶ 1. We review a published opinion of the court of appeals,1 which determined that use of a deceased police officer's recorded statements at a suppression hearing2 did not violate Glenn T. Zamzow's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We hold that the Confrontation Clause protects a defendant's right to confrontation at trial but not at suppression hearings, and admission of the deceased officer's recorded statements during the suppression hearing did not…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Juan Johnny HERNANDEZSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- State v. Joseph B. ReinwandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Jacob Richard BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. Mark D. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.