Legal Opinion

State v. Norton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 9, 2015No. 67/14PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

This case presents us with the question of whether a Forensic DNA Case Report, not executed under the penalty of perjury, but containing the language of “within a reasonable degree of scientific certainty”, was testimonial within the meaning of Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2221, 183 L.Ed.2d 89 (2012).

The testimonial issue was queued up when DNA was found on a mask that, according to witnesses, had been used in a robbery; the mask later was identified as potentially belonging to Harold Norton, Jr. 1 A small piece of the mask that contained saliva, from which a DNA sample was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Washington v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  5. Beckham v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API