State v. Norton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
This case presents us with the question of whether a Forensic DNA Case Report, not executed under the penalty of perjury, but containing the language of “within a reasonable degree of scientific certainty”, was testimonial within the meaning of Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2221, 183 L.Ed.2d 89 (2012).
The testimonial issue was queued up when DNA was found on a mask that, according to witnesses, had been used in a robbery; the mask later was identified as potentially belonging to Harold Norton, Jr. 1 A small piece of the mask that contained saliva, from which a DNA sample was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washington v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Leidig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Beckham v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.