Legal Opinion

Travis v. Preston

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2001No. Docket 221756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

In this case regarding alleged odors and fumes emanating from defendants Keith and Glenn Preston’s hog-farming operation, Preston Farms, defendants appeal by right the trial court’s order of judgment, entered after a bench trial, awarding plaintiffs Pete and Edna Travis $29,000 in damages and plaintiffs Richard and Patricia Johnson $29,000 in damages. We reverse and remand.

After defendants began a hog-farming operation in 1996, plaintiffs, who lived near the hog farm, filed this action for nuisance and injunctive relief against defendants. Plaintiffs alleged that they had resided at their…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Feaheny v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Rose Hill Center, Inc v. Holly TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Travis v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API