Legal Opinion

Zeloyle v. Bettor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1952No. Appeal, 194PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This is a quo warranto proceeding to determine the right to the office of chief of police of-the City of New Kensington as between the plaintiff and tbe defendant. On motion for judgment on the pleadings, the court below, sitting en banc, entered a judgment declaring Bettor, the defendant, to be unlawfully occupying the office and that Zeloyle, the plaintiff, is the “lawful, duly appointed and qualified chief of police of said City.” The defendant appealed.

The material facts are not in dispute. On April 18, 1950, the council of New Kensington (a third class city),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Simmler v. PhiladelphiaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Bussone v. BlatchfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Shoemaker v. City of Lock HavenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Katzenmoyer v. City of Reading, PADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Carlson v. BrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API