Legal Opinion

Katzenmoyer v. City of Reading, PA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-5574PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PADOVA, District Judge.

This matter arises on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ Motion, and grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint consistent with this memorandum with respect to those counts remaining.

I. Background

Plaintiffs allege the following facts. The City of Reading is a City of the Third Class. In about 1996, the City adopted a new charter, which changed the government from a commission form government to a city charter…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Atiyeh v. National Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Perelman v. PerelmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Kent v. Keystone Human ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Phillips v. HeydtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Cardionet, LLC v. Scottcare Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API