Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Chickasha Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Action by the Chickasha National Bank against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
POEEOCK, District Judge.
This was an' action in the nature of replevin brought by the Chickasha National Bank of Chickasha, in the Indian countr), now Oklahoma (hereinafter called the '“Bank”), against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company (hereinafter called! the “Railway Company”), to recover possession of 1,041 bales of cotton, or, in lieu thereof, a judgment against defendant for the amount or value of the special interest therein claimed by the Bank.
The facts necessary to a decision of the questions presented in this record are these:
In the autpmn of 190G a copartnership,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnston v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Butler v. MaplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Bickford v. . MenierNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- American Nat. Bank of Sapulpa v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Oklahoma State Bank v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.