Legal Opinion

Travis v. Travis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 1990No. 67851PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

In this divorce action, the appellant (Wife) presents as her sole issue whether the property division was erroneous and inequitable because the trial court declined to consider the good will of the appellee’s (Husband’s) law practice as a marital asset. In a summary opinion the Court of Appeals, Division 2, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Because this case is one of first impression, we granted certiorari.

At the time of trial, October, 1986, Husband was a 47-year-old lawyer who had been licensed to practice law in this state since 1962. The parties were married…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tessmar v. GrosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Taylor v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mocnik v. MocnikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Traczyk v. TraczykSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. McDiarmid v. McDiarmidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API