Legal Opinion

Mocnik v. Mocnik

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1992No. 72658PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

The primary legal question in this appeal is whether the goodwill of a medical practice is a marital asset subject to property division in a divorce. Since the case was tried below we have ruled in Travis v. Travis, 795 P.2d 96 (Okla.1990), that the goodwill of a law practice of a sole practitioner is not a divisible marital asset. We now conclude that the trial court erred in awarding the wife judgment based on an interest in the goodwill of her husband’s medical practice because the value of the Husband’s interest was determined by the stockholder’s agreement. The award for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Hanson v. HansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Hertz v. HertzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brozek v. BrozekNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Colclasure v. ColclasureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Traczyk v. TraczykSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Chandler v. ChandlerIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API