Legal Opinion

Lanes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1989No. 782-86PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

WHITE, Judge.

Appellant, a juvenile certified for trial as an adult under Section 54.02, V.T.C.A. Family Code, was convicted of burglary of a habitation. 1 Punishment was assessed at twenty years imprisonment.

The Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction holding inter alia, that a fingerprint order, issued pursuant to Section 51.15, V.T.C.A., Family Code, provided sufficient probable cause to arrest and fingerprint a juvenile. 2 Lanes v. State, 711 S.W.2d 403 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1986). Appellant petitioned this Court for discretionary…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hidalgo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Stull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  4. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. In the Interest of D.Z., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API