Hidalgo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HollandHolland, J.
in which MANSFIELD, PRICE, WOMACK, and KEASLER, J.J., joined.
Appellant Raymond Hidalgo, Jr., a juvenile, challenges his criminal conviction due to *748error in his transfer from juvenile court. He contends he was denied his right to the assistance of counsel because his appointed attorney was not notified of the psychological examination, conducted pursuant to § 54.02(d) of the Juvenile Justice Code, until after the exam occurred.1 The Fourth Court of Appeals rejected this contention holding, inter alia, no Sixth Amendment violation arose from the failure to give his attorney prior notice…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by97 opinions
- Moon, CameronCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Gilley, Brian ShawnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- In re J.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.