Stull v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Taylor Brent Stull, was convicted of the offense of possession of a controlled substance: namely tetrahydro-cannabinol. Punishment was assessed at three years’ imprisonment and a $300.00 fine. Imposition of the sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation.
The Austin Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in a published opinion. Stull v. State, 726 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.-Austin 1987). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the lower appellate…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hoag v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Joseph v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.