In the Interest of D.Z.

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

This is a juvenile court action in which the State proceeded against D.Z., a child, under determinate sentencing provisions.1 A jury found D.Z. used a deadly weapon and was guilty of capital murder. The jury also found that D.Z. needed rehabilitation, and assessed a determinate sentence of thirty-five years. By two points of error, D.Z. alleges that the State did not follow the controlling Family *563Code provisions when taking his confession, thus, the confession was improperly admitted at his adjudication. D.Z. seeks a new disposition. We reverse and remand for a…