Legal Opinion

Gill v. Timm

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1986No. 19350PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Robert V. Timm appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for money damages. Defendant also challenges the measure used by the trial court in fixing plaintiff’s damages. We hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and that defendant waived his right to challenge the trial court’s award of damages by failing to plead or argue mitigation of damages as an affirmative defense.

This action arose out of an automobile accident that occurred on December 2, 1979. Plaintiff was sitting in his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. General Insurance Co. of America v. Carnicero Dynasty Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Morgan v. Quailbrook Condominium Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. HarrisonUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Fishbaugh v. Utah Power & LightUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Consolidated Realty Group v. Sizzling Platter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. Gillmor v. GillmorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API