Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Quailbrook Condominium Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1985No. 18623PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Quailbrook Condominium Company (“Quailbrook”) appeals from a jury verdict awarding the plaintiffs, members of the Morgan family, $25,000 for intentional invasion of their land by the discharge of surface waters and $4,000 for intentional interference with plaintiffs’ supply of irrigation water for their crops. Quailbrook contends that the court erred in assuming that the intentional discharge of water onto the Morgan property was sufficient to render it liable for any resulting damages because the proper legal standard requires, in addition to the intentional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sanford v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Harris v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API