Consolidated Realty Group v. Sizzling Platter, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Justice.
Sizzling Platter, Inc. (“SPI”) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Consolidated Realty Group (“Consolidated”) and seeks judgment as a matter of law in its favor, or in the alternative a new trial on the issues of liability and damages.
I. FACTS
This appeal stems from a suit filed by Consolidated, a licensed real estate broker, against SPI to recover a commission for a lease entered into by Hewlett Packard (“Hewlett”) for space in a commercial building to be erected on property then owned by SPI and located at approximately 380 East 6400 South in Murray, Utah (the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Peterson & Simpson v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Cowley v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Minton v. LongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.