Legal Opinion

Consolidated Realty Group v. Sizzling Platter, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 27, 1996No. 950761-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice.

Sizzling Platter, Inc. (“SPI”) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Consolidated Realty Group (“Consolidated”) and seeks judgment as a matter of law in its favor, or in the alternative a new trial on the issues of liability and damages.

I. FACTS

This appeal stems from a suit filed by Consolidated, a licensed real estate broker, against SPI to recover a commission for a lease entered into by Hewlett Packard (“Hewlett”) for space in a commercial building to be erected on property then owned by SPI and located at approximately 380 East 6400 South in Murray, Utah (the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Peterson & Simpson v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cowley v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. Minton v. LongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API