Legal Opinion

Wright v. Campbell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2009No. WD 69141PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALOK AHUJA, Judge.

The circuit court granted summary judgment to Defendants-Respondents Scott Campbell and Cady & Campbell, L.L.C. (collectively “Campbell”), on the grounds that Plaintiff-Appellant Dorothy Wright’s legal malpractice claim was time-barred under a two-year Kansas statute of limitations made applicable by operation of Missouri’s borrowing statute, § 516.190. 1 Because we conclude that Wright’s malpractice claim originated in Missouri, and is therefore subject to Missouri’s five-year limitations period for such claims, we reverse.

I. Factual and Procedural Background 2

On May 8,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Powel v. Chaminade College Preparatory, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Martin v. Crowley, Wade & Milstead, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Adams v. One Park Place Investors, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. c. DallyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. English Ex Rel. Davis v. HersheweMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Helen Franzman v. Wyeth Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API