Legal Opinion

Helen Franzman v. Wyeth Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 2014No. ED100312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

Introduction

This appeal presents a poignant scenario raised in numerous lawsuits throughout the country against manufacturers of the prescription drug metoclopramide. Meto-clopramide, also sold under the brand name Reglan, is used to treat digestive problems including diabetic gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflex disorder. Users of metoclopramide have alleged, that manufacturers of the drug failed to adequately warn physicians, pharmacists, and consumers of the risks of developing tar-dive dyskinesia from prolonged use of the drug. Tardive dyskinesia is a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Reglan LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Guvenoz v. Target Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. v. Dorothy TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Norma Nicely v. Wyeth, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. v. Dorothy TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API