Legal Opinion

People v. Darwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1993No. A056730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case, we hold a one-year sentence enhancement under Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b), may be imposed for a prior prison term that is the basis of a conviction for petty theft with a prior under Penal Code section 666.

A jury convicted Melvin Julio Darwin of petty theft with a prior, and he admitted having served four prior prison terms for petty theft. The court sentenced him to the middle term of two years for the underlying offense plus four consecutive one-year terms for each of the prior prison terms.

Darwin contends one of the sentence enhancements must be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. McClanahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. TillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. NobletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. DemaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API