Legal Opinion

People v. Prather

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1990No. S007747PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In this case we consider whether article I, section 28, subdivision (f), of the California Constitution (a provision of an initiative *431measure popularly known as “Proposition 8”) bars application of the “double base term” limitation of Penal Code1 section 1170.1, subdivision (g),2to “prior prison term” enhancements under section 667.5, subdivision (b).3For the reasons stated below, we conclude the constitutional provision does bar the double-base-term limitation, and therefore reverse the contrary Court of Appeal decision.

Facts

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of second…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. AntickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API