Legal Opinion

People v. Wade

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1996No. F023913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

We will hold here that a defendant charged with possession of a firearm after the conviction of prior specified misdemeanors (Pen. Code, 1 § 12021, subd. (c)(1)) (section 12021(c)(1)) may admit he has suffered one or more prior convictions within the meaning of that section and thereby withhold the nature, but not the fact, of the convictions from the jury. In this case, however, the court’s refusal to accept such an offered stipulation was harmless error.

Facts

On January 22,1995, Bakersfield Police Officer Brian Silvius investigated a disturbance at the apartment complex at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. People v. Williams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Gonzalez v. Mathis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. ProfittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Gonzalez v. MathisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API