Legal Opinion

People v. McClanahan

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1992No. S021913PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether article I, section 28, subdivision (f) of the California Constitution (hereafter article I, section 28(f)), a provision of the 1982 initiative measure commonly referred to as “Proposition 8,” bars application of the “double-the-base-term” *862limitation of Penal Code1 section 1170.1, subdivision (g) (hereafter section 1170.1(g)) to “on-bail” enhancements imposed pursuant to section 12022.1.

In People v. Prather (1990) 50 Cal.3d 428 [267 Cal.Rptr. 605, 787 P.2d 1012], we concluded that “prior prison term” enhancements imposed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. Jovan B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. MeloneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. AugborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API