Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Wichita Falls v. McCamey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1937No. 6854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Martin

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals makes the following statement in this case:

“At different times from June 15, 1926, to October 1, 1926, both dates inclusive, McCamey & Sheerin, a copartnership composed of James W. McCamey and John J. Sheerin, became indebted to the First National Bank of Wichita Falls, Tex. (hereinafter called ‘the bank’), as evidenced by notes as follows: June 15, 1926, due 90 days after date, $30,000; August 5, 1926, due 90 days after date, $30,000; September 8, 1926, due on demand, $10,000;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Lubbock v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. McCamey v. First Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Slone v. First Nat. Bank of GormanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neeley v. County of TarrantTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McAllen State Bank v. Texas Bank & Trust CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Major Appliance Company, Inc. v. Gibson Refrigerator Sales Corporation and Hupp Corporation, Hupp Corporation v. Major Appliance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Central Power and Light Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Parks v. FrankfurtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API