Legal Opinion

McCamey v. First Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1934No. 1317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, J.ustice.

At different times from June 15, 1926, to October 1, 1926, both dates inclusive, Mc-Camey & Sheerin, a copartnership composed of James W. McCamey and John J. Sheerin, became indebted to the First National Bank 'of Wichita Falls, Tex. (hereinafter called “the bank”), as evidenced by notes as follows: June 15, 1926, due 90 days after date, $30,-000; August 5, 1926, due 90 days after date, $30,000; September 8, 1926, due on demand, $10,000; October 1, 1926, due on demand, $7,-500. Said notes, other than the $7,500 note, in the blank for listing collateral security stated the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Torrance v. Third Nat. Bank of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  2. San Antonio National Bank v. BlockerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. National Bank of Kentucky v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. First National Bank v. SouthworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. President of the Franklin Bank v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neeley v. County of TarrantTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. First National Bank of Wichita Falls v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Moore v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Conlee v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API