Luskey v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, Harry W. Luskey, chief machinist’s mate, United States Navy, was, by authority of the commanding officer at Pensacola, Florida, confirmed by the Secretary of the Navy, detailed for duty involving actual flying in aircraft Sept.
Read the full summary
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, Harry W. Luskey, chief machinist’s mate, United States Navy, was, by authority of the commanding officer at Pensacola, Florida, confirmed by the Secretary of the Navy, detailed for duty involving actual flying in aircraft Sept. IS, 1915, and continued on that duty until after February 1, 1917. He was on duty at the Navy Aeronautic Station, Pensacola, Fla., until January 2, 1917, when he was transferred to a ship on aeronautic duty, to wit, to the U. S. S. Seattle. During all…
1Opinion of the Court
Hat, J'udge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a suit brought by an enlisted man of the Navy to recover the sum of $279.95, which he alleges is due him by reason of his having been detailed to duty involving actual flying in aircraft under the provisions of the act of March 3, 1915, 38 Stat., 939, 940. The provisions of that act applicable to this case are: “ Hereafter enlisted men of the Navy and Marine Corps while detailed for duty invQlving actual flying-in aircraft shall receive the pay and the permanent additions thereto, including allowances, of their rating and service or rank…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Boone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Stribling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.