Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 18, 1929No. H-54PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This is a claim of an officer of the Medical Corps for 50 per centum increase of pay for the period from May 15, 1920, to TViarch 31,1921, inclusive, during which time he was detailed to duty as a flight surgeon at Luke Field, T. H. The sum of $934.12 was paid to plaintiff but was later deducted from his pay for the reason that during the time in question there was no provision of law authorizing the payment of increased flying pay to an officer of the Medical Corps. Plaintiff is suing to recover said sum.

The claim arises under the acts of'June 4, 1920,1 41 Stat. 769, and June 30, 1922,2 42…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Luskey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
  4. Culver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alloy Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  4. Lasher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Stribling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API