Legal Opinion

Stribling v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1929No. F-308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This is a claim of an Army officer who was assigned on July 30,1920, to duty “ involving regular and frequent aerial flights,” and from December, 1921, to January, 1922, the period for which increased pay is claimed in this suit, performed duty involving regular and frequent aerial flights.

The act of June 4, 1920, 41 Stat. 769, provides that “ Offi- ■ cers and enlisted men of the Army shall receive an increase of 50 per centum of their pay while on duty requiring them to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights.”

It is clear that this case is ruled by the decision of this court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  4. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  5. Luskey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API