Stribling v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge
This is a claim of an Army officer who was assigned on July 30,1920, to duty “ involving regular and frequent aerial flights,” and from December, 1921, to January, 1922, the period for which increased pay is claimed in this suit, performed duty involving regular and frequent aerial flights.
The act of June 4, 1920, 41 Stat. 769, provides that “ Offi- ■ cers and enlisted men of the Army shall receive an increase of 50 per centum of their pay while on duty requiring them to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights.”
It is clear that this case is ruled by the decision of this court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Luskey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939