Brown v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Judge
The question here presented involves the right of an officer in the Medical Corps of the Army, with the rank of captain, to increase of pay on account of special detail to flying or aircraft duty as a flight surgeon. The applicable *738statutes are the acts of June 3, 1916,1 39 Stat. 175, and June 4, 1920,2 41 Stat. 769.
On October 16, 1919, the plaintiff received special orders as follows:
“ Under the provisions of par. 1269%, A. R., the following named officer is hereby announced as being on duty requiring him to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights from the date as set opposite…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- Bradshaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
- Emmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
- Marshall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- Lasher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.