Legal Opinion

Clark v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 20, 1925No. B-63PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, Judge

The claim of this officer is based upon the provisions of section 13-A of the act of June 4, 1920, 41 Stat. 768-769. This section provides: “ Officers and enlisted men of the Army shall receive an increase of 50 per centum of their pay while on duty requiring them to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights.”

Ity order of the Secretary of War dated March 12, 1918, the plaintiff was placed on duty requiring him to participate regularly and frequently in aerial flights from February 12, 1918. This order, in so far as it affected the plaintiff, continued in full force and effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LuskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Luskey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Emmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  2. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Arnold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  4. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  5. Lasher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API