Weiden v. Woodruff

Defendant in error sought to recover m an action of assumpsit upon the following instrument:

“Grand Rapids, Sept. 14, 1874.

Messrs. Isaac Woodruff & Co., General agents of the Pharos Lightning Rod Company, Grand Rapids, Mich.— You will please send me galvanized lightning rods for my Rouse within sixty days, for which I will give you ■thirty-five cents per foot, due when work is completed.

H. Weiden.

Ten per cent, discount to be given on whole amount.”

Plaintiff proved that under this order he had delivered 206 feet of lightning rod.

Defendant claiming that this written instrument did mot constitute…