Legal Opinion

Eberts v. Selover

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Branch. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an .action brought to recover the subscription price of a local history. The subscription was obtained by an agent of the plaintiffs, and defendant signed his name tó a promise to pay ten dollars on the delivery of the book. This promise was printed in a little book, made use of for the purpose of obtaining such subscriptions, and on the opposite page, in sight of one signing, was a reference-' to “ rules to agents,” printed on the first page of the book. One of these rules was that “ no promise or statement made-by an agent which interferes with the intent of printed con-' tract…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rackemann v. Riverbank Improvement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Sutton v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. La Grande National Bank v. BlumOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Jacoway v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  5. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. HelleksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API