In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Scannell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 — In 2005, the Washington State Bar Association (Bar) began investigating grievances against John Scannell in two separate matters. One involved conflicts of interest arising from representing multiple clients and from a business transaction with a client, for which conflicts Scannell had not obtained written informed con*728sent from the clients. The other involved aiding a suspended lawyer, Paul King, in the practice of law during his suspension. Rather than cooperate with disciplinary counsel’s investigation, Scannell delayed answering, refused to appear or produce documents, and challenged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CottinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Beauregard v. Wash. State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against CottinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Judith Zimmerly, V. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023