In re Cottingham
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶ 1 Attorney David C. Cottingham embarked on a five-year boundary line dispute against his neighbor. His pursuit involved two lawsuits, four judicial appeals, two administrative appeals, countless motions, years of delay, unnecessary and wasteful expenditure of judicial resources, injury to his neighbors, and nearly $60,000 in sanctions for CR 11 violations. As a result, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) charged Cottingham with violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). At the conclusion of the proceedings, the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board (Board)…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- In re Disciplinary Proc. Against KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Fort Discovery Corp. v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020