Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Egger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2004No. 11611-3PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Attorney Phillip Egger appeals from the Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board’s (Board) recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months. The Washington State Bar Association’s (WSBA) hearing officer concluded that Egger had committed misconduct arising out of his representation of Marietta Gudeman and recommended a one-year suspension. The Board agreed that Egger charged Gudeman an unreasonable fee in violation of RPC 1.5(a), and that he failed to disclose and get written consent to a potential conflict of interest in violation of RPC 1.7(b). In a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API