Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Cottingham
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2018No. 201,704-5Published
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion was filed for record F I L E\ \ at 8-CO on 16, ZolS IN CLERKS OFFICE 'funecCOURT,anoE OF wkSHBieroM hatpAUG 1 fi ?fll8 I <-^-1 V SUSAN L. CARLSON 1^(Ua lUAM . QS "SUPREME COURT CLERK " ^GH&JUSJKS I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Disciplinary No. 201,704-5 Proceeding Against En Banc DAVID CARL COTTINGHAM, Filed Ml I 6 2018 an Attorney at Law. WIGGINS, J.—Attorney David C. Cottingham embarked on a five-year boundary line dispute against his neighbor. His pursuit involved two lawsuits, four judicial appeals, two administrative appeals, countless…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.