Matter of Shaddock v. Schwartz
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
The city of Buffalo advertised for bids for the plumbing work at a hospital. The plans and specifications provided that the bid for the main work be stated separately from bids for six additional items. Shaddock, the present appellant, without separating the items, put in a gross bid for $45,246. Other contractors put in bids separating the items, but higher in their totals. Thus, the bid of the Power Efficiency Corporation, represented by the respondent Fraser, was $38,900 for the main work and $8,973 for the additional items, a total of $47,873, and the bids of others were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Vickery v. RitchieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Hart v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Albers v. Shell CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- City of Rochester v. ChiarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Boland v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.