Legal Opinion

Albers v. Shell Company

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1930No. Docket No. 4026PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff had judgment against the defendants in an action prosecuted to recover damages for the death of his son, Winfrid Albers, by reason of the overturning of an oil truck belonging to the defendant corporation, and driven by the defendant Morton. From this judgment the defendants appeal.

The cause of action is based upon the alleged operation of the truck referred to while the steering mechanism thereof was in a defective and dangerous condition.

The complaint alleges in substance that by reason of the wilful, wanton and gross negligence of the defendants, the nut which holds the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Rolfe v. . HewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Meyer v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API