Legal Opinion
Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. State
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1926PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
His cock, Ch. J.
The appellant is seelcing to establish a claim against the State which is alleged to be supported by a moral consideration. In this attempt it has been confronted by two objections, the first being that there is no such consideration and the second that even if there is the State has never exercised its right to recognize the claim and authorize its allowance. The first objection seems to have been potential with the Court of Claims; the second one with the Appellate Division. There is no dispute concerning the decisive facts and we shall take these as they are presented by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Oswego Syracuse R.R. Co. v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Munro v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cole v. . the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency v. New England Merchants National Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Matter of Evans v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Matter of Mullane v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.